Skip to content

[chore](cloud) Fix txn_lazy_commit_test ut not stable #55717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2025
Merged

[chore](cloud) Fix txn_lazy_commit_test ut not stable #55717

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2025

Conversation

@SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor

@SWJTU-ZhangLei SWJTU-ZhangLei commented Sep 5, 2025

  • txn timeout 36000 ms is too short for asan, txn has been aborted by recycler , it will cause case failed.

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@SWJTU-ZhangLei
Copy link
Contributor Author

SWJTU-ZhangLei commented Sep 5, 2025

run buidall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Sep 5, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

dataroaring
dataroaring approved these changes Sep 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@dataroaring dataroaring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Sep 5, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2025

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2025

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@SWJTU-ZhangLei @dataroaring
[chore](cloud) Fix txn_lazy_commit_test ut not stable
69dc8b4 
* txn timeout 36000 ms is too short for asan, txn has been aborted by recycler
  , it will cause case failed.
@dataroaring
Copy link
Contributor

dataroaring commented Sep 6, 2025

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

doris-robot commented Sep 6, 2025

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (1/1) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 84.77% (1486/1753)
Line Coverage 68.25% (26766/39215)
Region Coverage 69.07% (13221/19142)
Branch Coverage 59.06% (7086/11998)

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit b6686b0 into apache:master Sep 6, 2025
26 checks passed
wenzhenghu pushed a commit to wenzhenghu/doris that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
@SWJTU-ZhangLei @wenzhenghu
[chore](cloud) Fix txn_lazy_commit_test ut not stable (apache#55717)
efbc499 
* txn timeout 36000 ms is too short for asan, txn has been aborted by
recycler , it will cause case failed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dataroaring dataroaring dataroaring approved these changes

@gavinchou gavinchou Awaiting requested review from gavinchou gavinchou is a code owner

@w41ter w41ter Awaiting requested review from w41ter w41ter is a code owner

+1 more reviewer

@bobhan1 bobhan1 bobhan1 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@SWJTU-ZhangLei @hello-stephen @dataroaring @doris-robot @bobhan1